What is Learnkey?
Which cabling jacket fire rating type is inexpensive but creates smoke and noxious fumes when burned? Polyvinyl chloride.
Which cabling type is shown? EIA/TIA 568B.
Which type of unshielded twisted pair cabling is best to use for horizontal runs? Solid core.
Which tool is used to attach an RJ-45 connector to a cable? Crimping tool.
What is described as a small, self-contained device used for replacements in an equipment rack? Patch panel.
Google and IBM are bonding in a serious way
PC era fading, cloud computing rising -- watch out, Microsoft?
May 2, 2008 (Computerworld) LOS ANGELES -- While Microsoft Corp. chases Yahoo Inc., Eric Schmidt, Google Inc.'s CEO and chairman, is seeking a stronger relationship with IBM, something IBM Chairman and CEO Sam Palmisano appears very interested in.
Schmidt, who spoke at the IBM's PartnerWorld conference here, later shared the stage at the Nokia Theater with Palmisano to discuss cloud computing, globalization and other issues.
The two CEOs bantered like old golf buddies, praising each other's organizations and rarely giving moderator Pankaj Ghemawat, a professor of global strategy at the IESE Business School in Barcelona, Spain, a chance to ask questions.
Google and IBM collaborated last year on a compute cloud-type system -- a platform for delivering scalable IT capabilities as a service -- and then turned it over for universities to use. It was a pilot project, but it was clear from today that the two firms will be doing more.
Google wants enterprise customers for its applications, which are delivered as services via compute clouds. What it needs to help make that happen is IBM.
In response to a question about IBM from this reporter after his talk, Schmidt said IBM is one of the "key planks of the strategy" for reaching enterprise customers. "Customers like to buy from strong sales forces that provide real quality service, and IBM is the best at that," he said.
For his part, Palmisano offered a Google-like view of the universe when told his business-partner audience that the "PC is receding in influence" and is being replaced by network infrastructures.
To that point, IBM this week said it will offer an iTunes-like application delivery model for small and midsize businesses. Its Blue Business Platform will deliver complete and integrated software from either IBM or participating independent software vendors.
The company's "Global Application Marketplace" will include applications and services delivered via an online catalog directly to a user's server, as well as Web 2.0-like peer ratings of the products. IBM officials said they see it as a direct challenge to Microsoft in that market.
And there may be other, less tangible benefits to Google-IBM cooperation.
Frank Gens, an analyst at market research firm IDC, said the two companies likely want to pool engineering talent on developing a cloud computing platform, as well as putting both their brands behind it. And combining Google's "cool" with IBM's enterprise credibility could boost acceptance of the cloud business platform.
Today, IBM is developing Blue Cloud, a system that will enable enterprises to build cloud-type system as a means to deliver services via a cloud internally or to external users. It's due to release details of the system in the next month or two.
Palmisano said he believes that he and Schmidt share a common view of the future, which includes commitment to standards and open architectures.
IBM and Google are similar in many respects, said Schmidt, with "engineering-oriented cultures" and support for collaboration.
Palmisano said maintaining a strong research and development effort is critical for IBM, otherwise his "scientists would leave -- they would go to Google."
IBM and Google are bonding in a business way. The chairmen of these computer/internet corporations where playing golf together and were praising each others businesses. Google and IBM might want to do similar things Microsoft tried to do will Yahoo. Microsoft wanted to combine with yahoo to create and bigger more powerful corporation and share certain ideas and applications. If Google and IBM team up it may be powerful enough to match Microsoft it not surpass it. This may be a big victory and may establish some sort of monopoly, which may be a bad thing for consumers. It means for what ever the two they can set whatever prices they feel.
Friday, May 2, 2008
Thursday, May 1, 2008
Software News
What is a Lab?
Which was the first topology type to be used in practical networks? Mesh.
Within a ring topology, data travels in a clockwise direction only. True.
In which network topology is data sent first to a central device and then distributed to the systems that need the data? Ring.
What does the acronym MAC represent? Medium Access Control.
What information can be viewed when a network card is set to promiscuous mode? Only information from machines with the same MAC address as its own.
Microsoft's Office streaming price too high to compete with Google Apps, some partners say
Pricing through ASPs may be four times or more what Google charges for its applications
April 30, 2008 (Computerworld) As Microsoft Corp. moves toward allowing application service providers to stream Office to their customers, the software vendor still seems to fear hurting itself more than being hurt by Google Inc.
At its Hosting Summit 2008 earlier this month in Bellevue, Wash., Microsoft officials quietly told application service providers (ASP) that they would soon be able to sell subscriptions to Office and then deliver the desktop applications to users via the Internet.
End users would access Office through application streaming, an up-and-coming technology that lets companies store applications on servers and then use the Internet or their own local networks to send the code to PCs. Corporate customers that have purchased maintenance and update contracts under Microsoft's Software Assurance program can already stream Office to internal employees. But this is the first time that Microsoft is extending the capability to ASPs, which have long campaigned for the right to do streaming.
Nevertheless, some hosting providers are unhappy about the price that Microsoft has set for streaming Office, saying it's too high to win over customers that are considering or already using less-expensive online office suites, such as Google Apps.
In addition to a free, unsupported version of Google Apps, Google offers its software in an enterprise version that includes technical support and costs $50 per end user annually. Google is still trying to build up its suite's credibility with corporate users. But early indications from ASPs are that streaming Office 2007 will cost four to six times what Google charges for its applications.
For instance, one Microsoft reseller is charging ASPs $10.20 per month for a streaming client license of Office Standard 2007, according to a price sheet seen by Computerworld. A license for Office Professional Plus 2007 costs $13.23 per user on a monthly basis through the reseller.
"I don't believe that this will attract a large number of customers currently using Google Apps," said Gagan Prakash, senior executive director of engineering at GroupSpark Inc., a Burlington, Mass.-based company that delivers hosted versions of Microsoft products through other service providers. Why does Prakash think that? Because, he said, hosting providers will need to mark up the price between 50% and 150% in order to make a profit, thereby resulting in a monthly retail price of $15 to $25 per user for Office Standard.
"In order to compete with Google, Microsoft should have a lower-end offering that is very, very competitive on pricing," Prakash said. "This [price] isn't nearly aggressive enough."
Others say the cost of the streaming option may also be too high to tempt companies that currently run on-premises versions of Office.
A full-priced retail copy of Office — the kind that is bought by individuals and by some small and midsize businesses — costs about $300. Amortized over three years, that's roughly $8.50 per month.
But even many small companies buy reseller copies of Office, which can be half the price or less, said Paul DeGroot, an analyst at Directions on Microsoft in Kirkland, Wash. Others simply wait four or five years, or even longer, to upgrade Office.
"If you're the kind of person still using Office 2000, then paying even $10 a month is not a particularly good prospect, financially," DeGroot said.
Through a spokeswoman, Microsoft declined to comment for this story.
But sources said that Microsoft has told ASPs that the prices may change and that more options, including a license that charges service providers by the number of server CPUs used to stream Office, should emerge over time. The latter license would enable ASPs to charge customers a price based on their usage of Office — an approach that could give companies whose employees are sporadic or light Office users a lower entry-level cost than the flat-fee subscription price would.
Many software venders feel Microsoft’s office streaming prices are too high. These venders don’t want to sell too expensive products to their customers because they fear that if prices are too high demand will decline. I have never used Microsoft Office Streaming, but I have seen the prices for the regular Microsoft Office and it is quite expensive. I do need that software for college though, so either way I should be buying Microsoft Office.
Which was the first topology type to be used in practical networks? Mesh.
Within a ring topology, data travels in a clockwise direction only. True.
In which network topology is data sent first to a central device and then distributed to the systems that need the data? Ring.
What does the acronym MAC represent? Medium Access Control.
What information can be viewed when a network card is set to promiscuous mode? Only information from machines with the same MAC address as its own.
Microsoft's Office streaming price too high to compete with Google Apps, some partners say
Pricing through ASPs may be four times or more what Google charges for its applications
April 30, 2008 (Computerworld) As Microsoft Corp. moves toward allowing application service providers to stream Office to their customers, the software vendor still seems to fear hurting itself more than being hurt by Google Inc.
At its Hosting Summit 2008 earlier this month in Bellevue, Wash., Microsoft officials quietly told application service providers (ASP) that they would soon be able to sell subscriptions to Office and then deliver the desktop applications to users via the Internet.
End users would access Office through application streaming, an up-and-coming technology that lets companies store applications on servers and then use the Internet or their own local networks to send the code to PCs. Corporate customers that have purchased maintenance and update contracts under Microsoft's Software Assurance program can already stream Office to internal employees. But this is the first time that Microsoft is extending the capability to ASPs, which have long campaigned for the right to do streaming.
Nevertheless, some hosting providers are unhappy about the price that Microsoft has set for streaming Office, saying it's too high to win over customers that are considering or already using less-expensive online office suites, such as Google Apps.
In addition to a free, unsupported version of Google Apps, Google offers its software in an enterprise version that includes technical support and costs $50 per end user annually. Google is still trying to build up its suite's credibility with corporate users. But early indications from ASPs are that streaming Office 2007 will cost four to six times what Google charges for its applications.
For instance, one Microsoft reseller is charging ASPs $10.20 per month for a streaming client license of Office Standard 2007, according to a price sheet seen by Computerworld. A license for Office Professional Plus 2007 costs $13.23 per user on a monthly basis through the reseller.
"I don't believe that this will attract a large number of customers currently using Google Apps," said Gagan Prakash, senior executive director of engineering at GroupSpark Inc., a Burlington, Mass.-based company that delivers hosted versions of Microsoft products through other service providers. Why does Prakash think that? Because, he said, hosting providers will need to mark up the price between 50% and 150% in order to make a profit, thereby resulting in a monthly retail price of $15 to $25 per user for Office Standard.
"In order to compete with Google, Microsoft should have a lower-end offering that is very, very competitive on pricing," Prakash said. "This [price] isn't nearly aggressive enough."
Others say the cost of the streaming option may also be too high to tempt companies that currently run on-premises versions of Office.
A full-priced retail copy of Office — the kind that is bought by individuals and by some small and midsize businesses — costs about $300. Amortized over three years, that's roughly $8.50 per month.
But even many small companies buy reseller copies of Office, which can be half the price or less, said Paul DeGroot, an analyst at Directions on Microsoft in Kirkland, Wash. Others simply wait four or five years, or even longer, to upgrade Office.
"If you're the kind of person still using Office 2000, then paying even $10 a month is not a particularly good prospect, financially," DeGroot said.
Through a spokeswoman, Microsoft declined to comment for this story.
But sources said that Microsoft has told ASPs that the prices may change and that more options, including a license that charges service providers by the number of server CPUs used to stream Office, should emerge over time. The latter license would enable ASPs to charge customers a price based on their usage of Office — an approach that could give companies whose employees are sporadic or light Office users a lower entry-level cost than the flat-fee subscription price would.
Many software venders feel Microsoft’s office streaming prices are too high. These venders don’t want to sell too expensive products to their customers because they fear that if prices are too high demand will decline. I have never used Microsoft Office Streaming, but I have seen the prices for the regular Microsoft Office and it is quite expensive. I do need that software for college though, so either way I should be buying Microsoft Office.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
